Everything about Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion totally explained
Dialogues concerning Natural Religion is a philosophical work written by the
Scottish philosopher David Hume. Through dialogue, three fictional characters named Demea, Philo, and Cleanthes debate the nature of
God's existence. While all three agree that a god exists, they differ sharply in opinion on God's nature or attributes and how, or if, humankind can come to knowledge of a deity.
In the
Dialogues, Hume's characters debate a number of
arguments for the
existence of God, and arguments whose proponents believe through which we may come to know the nature of God. Such topics debated include the argument from design -- for which Hume uses a house -- and whether there's more suffering or good in the world (
argument from evil).
Hume started writing the
Dialogues in 1750 but didn't complete them until 1776, shortly before his death. They are based partly on
Cicero's
De Natura Deorum. The
Dialogues were published
posthumously in 1779, originally with neither the author's nor the publisher's name.
Characters
- Pamphilus is a youth present during the dialogues. In a letter, he reconstructs the conversation of Demea, Philo, and Cleanthes in detail for his friend Hermippus. He serves as the narrator throughout the piece. At the end of the Dialogues he believes that Cleanthes offered the strongest arguments. However, this could be through loyalty to his teacher and certainly doesn't support Hume's views (Cicero used a similar technique in his Dialogues).
- Cleanthes is a theist—"an exponent of orthodox rationalism"—who presents a version of the teleological argument for God's existence using the deductive paradigm.
- Philo, according to the predominant view among scholars, "probably represents a viewpoint similar to Hume's own." Philo attacks Cleanthes' views on anthropomorphism and teleology; while not going as far as to deny the existence of god, Philo asserts that human reason is wholly inadequate to make any assumptions about the divine, whether through a priori reasoning or observation of nature.
- Demea "defends the Cosmological argument and philosophical theism..."
He believes that instead of reason, people should base beliefs concerning God's nature through fideism. Demea reject's Cleanthes' "natural religion" for being too anthropomorphic. Demea objects to the abandonment of the a priori ideas of rationalism. He perceives Philo and Cleanthes to be "selling out to scepticism."
Further Information
Get more info on 'Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://dialogues_concerning_natural_religion.totallyexplained.com">Dialogues concerning Natural Religion Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |